iris

With renting the lessor isn't pretending to give you permanent ownership of something. When you buy a digital asset from a marketplace like itunes or amazon there's the expectation that your access to that asset is now a permanent right, and yet they violate that right constantly. More broadly I'd argue information cannot be considered property in the same way a car is because it's not scarce or rivalrous. There a limited amount of cars, there is a functionally unlimited amount of copies of a file. If one person is using a car that means another person can't use it, whereas if I copy a file you're using then we can both use it.
0
So someone is only entitles to sell 1 copy of their work because once they do that it's public domain? Yeah, that's not going to work. You may have an expectation of how a digital marketplace works, but it's up to you to understand how it works before putting down your money. I think these markets should also make their terms readily accessible and understandable, but the point stands that the seller can set terms of the transaction. It's then up to the buyers whether they accept them or not.
0