Post
The movement of the stars invalidates FE, IMO.
Also, Starlink as "sataloons" wouldn't be feasible
NASA fakes a lot of ISS footage and also the Apollo mission (as seen on TV) was obviously faked
Laser experiments show that there is not the expected curvature over long distances and we can see way past the horizon, but there may be other explanations for this other than the earth being flat.
Antarctica treaty is also super suss
Still, IMO, the preponderance of evidence supports the conventional sphere model of earth
The results of the laser experiments are tough to explain though
0
0
0
0
I actually like Crater Earth but it's definitely schizo as fuck: rumble.com/user/Godgevlamste Start at the beginning or it won't make any sense.
For me FE doesn't mean "flat pancake", it's more an attempt of having a common term for non-globe ideas so some measurable curvature isn't unexpected. But I'm still in the early stages of trying to get a grasp of all of this and I'm not an advocate for anything. Just questioning the globe as it is but ig it turns out to be true, so be it. Not looking for religion here. ✌️
0
0
0
0