Post
Depressed Octopus
> control
Indeed, this is a intrinsic to hierarchy. But control *without* centralisation, which is food for thought.
It's potentially a useful concept in analysing things like White Supremacist and Islamist terror networks. Which are superficially similar to hetarchical networks of anarchist affinity groups, but unlike those, based on a clearly understood hierarchy with a presumed chain of command.
Tasteless Harrier Control implies synchronization. It can be weak in agreeing only upon the goal and leaving operation distributed, occasionally coordinated. I've seen a paper on rice paddy farmers exercising optimal land use in such fashion.
Centralized model here then gain efficiency by elements relinquishing subjectivity to the centre (or hierarchy). Conversely, such models can't fight the 'be like water' or similar organizational structures.
Cheers!