Post
Accepting that is a true dichotomy, what I'm saying is when people tell you who they are listen. Certainly the police can shoot a guy in the head for threating non-lethal violence on another under appropriate circumstances. If a group takes over a building under the banner of an admitted criminal enterprise funded by the same threat of violence, a banner of violence and declared unlawfulness, I'm not sure that makes a difference. In otherwords, I think the grayness isn't in the law as you describe it, the grayness is in the complexity of human interaction.
0
0
0
Well said, and I completely agree. The laws are ultimately a guideline. People can and do act outside the bounds, and are only sometimes held accountable. The grayness as you call it, is a product of human behavior and rationale. But I don't think that reality means we should view the law as a suggestion or an guideline. I think we should strive uphold its principle and preserve its intent. Because when you start chipping away at it, and deciding more and more to act contrary to its letter, it loses its meaning, and becomes irrelevant.
0
0
0
0