Post by FiddleHodlHomestead
All I'm saying is what actually took place. I'm not arguing anything related to the substance of the trial.
0
0
0
0
Yes, I understand. And what you're saying really sucks for Ross.
It's like if you're on trial for shoplifting and feel that you didn't get a fair trial so you appeal it, and the DA says no - and by the way we also think this person broke into someone's home. They never actually arrest you for the break-in but you get 5 years for shoplifting because the judge is influenced by the break-in accusations (that you never get to counter in court).
0
0
0
0
Well, in this case, Ross' lawyers were able to confront the allegations, and the evidence presented by the prosecution, but the judge agreed with the prosecution and determined that there was sufficient evidence to make a probable determination that the alleged conduct did take place.
0
0
0
0
